Chances are when you hear the words “billions and
billions” spoken, you do not hear them in your own voice, but in the voice of the
late Carl Sagan – that is if you’ve ever seen Cosmos, the fascinating 13-part science series he wrote and narrated.
(Although he really never said that in Cosmos. We only think he did because Johnny
Carson would often do a funny bit imitating Sagan and he would say “billions
and billions”). And that is the voice I heard as I settled
into The Demon-Haunted World: Science As A Candle In The Dark, published
in 1996, the year of his death. The book
is so Saganesque that nearly two decades later, that slightly nasal, roundish voice
is what I heard on every page.
Sagan takes on all manner of magical thinking, without
reservation: pseudoscience,
superstition, zealotry, witchcraft and “biblical literalists.” UFO encounters, miraculous healings, beatific
visions, claims of being teleported to alien spaceships all have prosaic
explanations, he believed, once subjected to common sense analysis. “There are wonders enough out there without
our inventing them.” Living in what is considered
the most haunted city in America, I must take umbrage with his scoffing at the
existence of ghosts, however, for they most certainly do exist. Savannah has oodles of them; we’ve built a
burgeoning tourist industry on them. One
stormy night I’ll tell you about my own experiences. But, for now we will only speak about this incredibly
enthralling book.
In short, Carl Sagan was the nonpareil scientist who
believed only that which can stand up to scientific proof. One might come away with the conviction that
Sagan was an atheist; however, he denied this.
Sagan explained faith as belief in the absence of evidence; he would simply
withhold belief until there was evidence. If one could actually prove an infinitely old
universe, he argued, then one might be able to disprove the existence of a God
Creator. An atheist essentially declares
there is no God – a theory which Sagan believed was impossible to prove - at
least in his lifetime with the tools currently at our disposal. He fit more comfortably into the cloak of an
agnostic. I believe if God could be
proven there would be no need for faith; and, science requires that we
skeptically interrogate the universe. But
I find no discordant notes between the two, probably because I’d rather not.
As dismissive as he was regarding the validity of “miracles”
and a life after death, he was nevertheless very careful to acknowledge the
positivity religion can bring to the lives of humans: history, ethics,
compassion, morals, and poetry can, and often do, find their roots in religious
belief. Where he found fault was in what
he termed “biblical literalists” who believed in a God who spoke to an unerring
stenographer, leaving no room for allegory or metaphor or interpretation. Sagan did not suffer those whom he considered
fools easily.
It is no surprise that Sagan was a great champion of
reading and critical thinking, which are delightfully subversive and dangerous
in any unjust society. This was true in
the days of American slavery and is true today in cultures that can only thrive
if certain segments of the population are kept in the darkness illiteracy breeds. As he rightly points out, tyrants have always
understood that literacy and the free expression of ideas through books and
newspapers encourage thought. Thought
begets disobedience and skepticism and, ultimately, power over the tyrant. “The gears of poverty, ignorance,
hopelessness and low self-esteem mesh to create a kind of perpetual failure
machine that grinds down dreams from generation to generation. We all bear the cost of keeping it running.” Sadly, not much has changed since he wrote
those words a generation ago. One only needs to look at reading scores (if
students are even tested anymore in our culture of “everyone wins so no
feelings are hurt.”).
Sagan tells the story of a young slave named Frederick
Bailey who understood literacy was the path to freedom. Armed with that understanding, he taught
himself to read, fled to New England, and changed his name to Frederick
Douglass, after a character in Sir Walter Scott’s The Lady of the Lake.
Douglass went on to become one of the greatest orators in American
history. As Sagan says, “There are many
kinds of slavery and many kinds of freedom.
But reading is still the path.”
If it can be said that there is a dichotomy between
science and mysticism, Carl Sagan himself was a sort of fascinating dichotomy. His greatest hero was Thomas Jefferson, which
surprised me. Not that Jefferson doesn’t deserve the accolade
(he is a hero of mine as well), but there is a bit of disconnect when in
extolling Jefferson’s virtues as a scientist, botanist, astronomer, philosopher,
writer, thinker and, of course, chief author of the Declaration of Independence
– he fails to point out he was also a slaveholder. This is what Sagan might call two uneasily
cohabiting modes of thought. It also
makes him more human and approachable.
Reading The
Demon-Haunted World, though not tome-like, took longer to finish than I
expected. Not because it wasn’t gripping
and exceedingly well written; it was both.
But I found myself going off on tangents, putting the book down to find more
information on topics he was raising, like Franz Mesmer, or Project Ozma, or Edward
Teller and thermonuclear war (which is far more frightening than the prospect
of being teleported to a space ship or running into a ghost at the top of the
attic stair, let me tell you). But I was
also fascinated by Carl Sagan, the person, and in his private life. I can see why people either loved or despised
him. (Apparently, he could be something
of a pill. His second wife
understandably finds it hard to forgive him after he informed her that he and their
mutual friend, Ann Druyan, discovered they were hopelessly in love and were
going to get married.) Sagan seems to
have had an insatiable need for attention – both personally and in his work. But the man could think, and write, and
inspire. This book is wise, elegant, lucid, unyielding and as far from dull as science can get. We have lost much.